Tom on twitter

Button Jewellery

Green Man Humming music technology

hacking an electric 5 string viola

unmodified crap elecxtric violaAs part of our long term ambition for Pillowfish to sound more like Rammstein we have been buying, building and experimenting with some effects. It has become clear that Helen needs a solid body electric viola because it is hard to hear what the effects are doing when you have a loud acoustic viola un-effected directly under your ear. Also, when we get louder a solid body instrument will be more resistant to feedback.

Since I don’t have a workshop in which to build some of the electric viola designs that have been in my head for years, and we want to get on with it, we decided to buy a cheapo electric viola from evilbay and hack it.

First image on the left is what it looked like when we got it. It was much too heavy. The pickup and preamp were not great, the pegbox was too small for easy access to all 5 pegs.

So I hacked it. I drilled loads of holes to lighten it. Removed the scroll and the upper outline. Widened and lengthened the pegbox so the pegs were more accessible. Replaced the pickup and preamp with my own design. Fitted knilling perfection pegs.

It now sounds quite good, and is light enough to play. The pickup is simply 2 piezo film tabs, one under each bridge foot, wired out of phase, because the bridge feet vibrate out of phase. Shielded with self adhesive copper foil. I used my normal fet source follower preamp, powered remotely so that there doesn’t need to be a battery adding weight to the instrument.

Here are some pictures of the modified viola.

using fishing line for classical guitar strings

I have bought about a dozen different types and weights of fishing line to try as strings.

I had originally intended to simply weigh a measured length of each line, and plug that weight into the formula for calculating string tension for a given pitch and scale length, and use that to work out which line would work for which note.

For those who want to make their own spreadsheets or otherwise play with the figures, that formula is:

Tension in Kg = 4 x Frequency in Hz squared x Length in cm x Mass of that length in grams / 980621

This works more or less OK for steel strings, but for nylon or other monofilaments it’s not that simple.

A nylon string stretches by anything up to 25% under tension, so the mass per unit length drops proportionately. The stretching is somewhat but not exactly proportional to the tension, and varies with time under strain in a complex interplay of short term elasticity and long term permanent stretch.

Bugger. My clever table of mass per unit length figures is only a starting point at best. Not to mention my Java string tension calculator which does not take stretching into account. I’m fairly sure D’addario’s published data doesn’t take stretching into account either, but I’ll check that later.

One of the first rolls of line I received after my shopping spree on evilbay was a roll of Ultima Red Ice 30lb 0.5mm line.

This stuff is a cool fluorescent red colour and I chose it as a likely candidate for a high A (440Hz) or B (494hz) string on classical guitar.

It is very flexible and ties easily.

I weighed a length of it and calculated a mass per meter of 0.245g – plugged into the formula that suggests a tension of 8.14Kg when tuned to 440hz on a standard guitar scale length of 648mm

That’s high tension for a classical guitar, but not much higher than published by D’addario for their higher tension E strings. Plus, I always knew it would stretch a bit so it was a good pick.

I put it on the guitar , and after a LOT of stretching, I finally got it up to an A, after a lot more stretching and a couple of days settling, it held the A pretty well. I had wound more than i needed to onto the peg, so the turns round the peg were also stretching, which made the process worse for settling in, although its irrelevant to the final tension. I am now testing by winding the absolute minimum onto the peg in the knowledge that the peg will still end up with plenty of turns on it as the string stretches.

Best of all it sounded pretty good. I could live with this as a high A string. First time WIN! (Call it beginners luck since my later experiments gave more mixed results)

After all that stretching I knew that the tension must have ended up much lower, and it certainly didn’t feel like 8kg. So I got another length of the line and tested it on a board with a machine head at one end, and a hanging scales at the other. I used two bits of wood to stop the string at the correct 648mm distance, and tuned it up to A 440hz. After some settling and stretching and retuning the tension measured 6.8kg. Quite a bit less than the 8.14Kg suggested by using the unstretched weight

The string had stretched by about 15%, but I didn’t get a very accurate measurement of that.

Once the string was at pitch I marked the ends of the 648mm with sharpie , and let the tension off, of course the string contracted again, by most but not all of the length it had stretched while tuning up. I then cut the string at the marks and weighed that piece, then plugged that weight into the formula. The result was 6.65kg. Close enough to the 6.8 measured directly, considering the many slightly inaccurate measurements involved.

So I can say that that particular type of line has a tension of around 6.7Kg when tuned to A440 on a 648mm scale. Unfortunately, because the amount of stretch is dependent on the tension, I can’t directly extrapolate to other pitch and scale length combinations.

My ambition of a universal string tension calculator for fishing lines is looking rather distant at this point. I would need accurate tension / stretch curves plotted carefully for each different sort of line. Stretching time would have to be left between each increment of tension for each line. I think this would be weeks or months of work and would benefit from better scales than I have.

All is not lost however. The table of weights of unstretched line serves as a maximum, the line will never be heavier per unit length than when it is new. The amount of stretch can be guessed to within a useful margin once you have some experience. I could perhaps even build this guesswork into an applet.

Heavier strings will stretch less, and strings made of harder materials such as fluorocarbon, will also stretch less. So this can be taken into account when choosing which line to use.

To complicate matters further, there is a wide variety of types of line available.

here’s what I’ve tried so far for classical guitar strings (I tune my guitar CGDAEA or CGDAEB, sorry about that, you’ll just have to extrapolate for standard tuning!)

Ultima Hard Core 70lb breaking strain
0.7mm diameter unstretched weight 0.536g/m

This stuff is very stiff, relatively hard to knot, a little heavier than the softer monofilaments and stretches noticeably less than most.

I tried it as a guitar E 329hz – I found it unsuitable for classical guitar as it just didn’t have the suppleness and the tone was not to my taste. The tension at E was a bit too high. (tension based on unstretched weight is 9.9kg, actual tension must be not much less than 9kg) A lighter gauge of the same stuff might work better, but I wasn’t inspired to experiment further with this for guitar.

Daiwa Sensor 50lB breaking strain
0.74mm diameter, unstretched weight 0.518g/m

This is a fairly normal supple nylon mono, in a nice dark brown colour. It knotted easily. There’s a fair bit of stretch, but i didn’t tune it all the way to E, so it didn’t stretch as much as it would have with more tension. I only took it up to D. I found the tone a bit dull, and the weight a bit heavy for an E string, but too light for an A string. It might work OK for a lowish tension B string on standard tuning guitar if you want a warm rounded tone.

Ultima Seastrike 50lb breaking strain 0.7mm diameter, unstretched weight 0.509g/m

This is the most normal standard nylon mono I have tried so far. It’s incredibly cheap. It is supple and bends easily, but is also very slick, so knots pull through unless you use lots of turns.

There’s a quite a lot of stretch, although of course none of these E strings stretch as much as the thin line I used for the high A.

I tuned this to E and it actually works pretty well. I could use this happily enough as an E string. It’s hard to say if the tone is as good as purpose made classical guitar strings, but it’s reasonably close at first listen.

Ultima Seastrike 25lb breaking strain 0.45mm diameter, unstretched weight 0.182g/m

This line was bought for an attempt at a high B. It is the lightest line I have. Like the 50lB version it is very slick, and knots pull through easily, but worse because the line is so thin and flexible. The first attempt the knot unravelled. The second attempt I broke the string with a bad knot. The third attempt the string held, and after much stretching made it up to high B 494hz.

It doesn’t sound too bad. Given that this is pushing the absolute limit of pitch that is possible on a guitar I’m fairly pleased. I think this line might be a tiny bit too light for the best tone. Unstretched weight implies tension of 7.6kg at high B, but of course it will be much lower with all the stretch of this thin line. It feels more like 5.5kg. I have a couple of other lines using different materials to try for high B and I’ll report on those when I’ve tested them.

Supacast 100lB breaking strain 1mm diameter unstretched weight 0.936g/m

I bought this to use for my mid A string 220hz. Tension implied by the unstretched weight is 7.76kg, and since the string is so thick and doesn’t stretch too much actual tension is probably around 7kg. This line is similar to the seastrike, but the tone is duller. I think the 1mm is too heavy, it feels a bit heavy and the tone is rather dull and round, reminiscent of the daiwa sensor. The tone is brightening a little as the string plays in and stretches a little more. This line might work OK for G in standard tuning, but I will look for something a bit lighter around 0.9mm for my A.

That’s all I’ve tried for classical guitar so far. I have also tried several lines as E strings on cello and viola, and learned that the criteria for that are very different from classical guitar! I will leave that report until a future post as this one is quite long enough already.

Send me your old strings and I will do science on them

So following on from the previous post, I am compiling a database of strings, and I will publish it once I have enough useful info.

You can help by sending me your old strings.

I am interested in:

Violin, Viola and Cello strings, especially Pirastro , or any other brand that doesn’t publish string tension data. However i’m also interested in strings from manufacturers who do publish the info, so i can check it, and also see how the strings have changed with use and ageing.

Guitar strings of unusual construction such as silk and steel or flat wound, especially if the tension data is not available.

Fishing line or any other sort of string, braid, wire or line that could be re-purposed to use as a musical instrument string.

I would prefer new unused fishing line, since its cheap, but i only need a little over a meter to test. So please, if you have a roll of suitable line spare me a meter of it for the greater good of music!

To start with I will only test monofil fishing lines with diameter between 0.4mm and 1.2mm, and a breaking strain of more than 20lBs/9Kg (thinner line is unlikely to be useful for instruments, unless someone is making fairy harps)

I will have to cut the ends off the violin/viola/cello strings since to weigh them I need only the active part. This means that they will be destroyed and you won’t get them back. This is why I’m asking for used / worn out / broken strings. It would be more accurate to use new strings, but that would be wasteful and prohibitively expensive. I will try to study and compensate for the effects of wear and stretching on the weight of the strings.

email me at himself AT tomdrinkwater DOT com to get the address to send strings or with any enquiries.

String tension, fishing line, a new project.

For many years I have been interested in the mechanics of strings.

The different sounds that are obtained with different materials and the relationship between weight, scale length and tension, and then how that relates to the more subjective issue of perceived stiffness under the fingers.

Way back in 1999 I wrote a java applet that calculated the string tension for a given scale length and type of string. I took it off the web a few years ago, but I have been overhauling it and I will reinstate it when it is ready and improved.

Such calculators are commonplace, but they rarely have data on unusual types of strings.

D’addario publish their string tension data for many of their strings and this info is really useful for players wanting to assemble a set of strings with matched tensions, or for a non standard scale length or whatever other non standard situation.

However there are gaps in this data, some D’addario strings are not included, and other manufacturers don’t publish all their data in one place, you have to buy the string before you have the info written on the packet, perhaps only to find the string is unsuitable.

For steel core guitar strings the differences between brands will be small, a .042 gauge phosphor bronze string by D’addario is likely to be a very similar weight to one by GHS. However, for strings of more complex design such as violin, viola and cello strings, or complex silk and steel core or semi flat wound guitar strings, all assumptions are invalid and the only solution is to know the mass per unit length of the string.

Some manufacturers (I’m looking at Pirastro here especially) don’t publish their tension data at all. I can’t imagine why they feel it needs to be a secret. If they didn’t make such good strings I’d would simply dismiss them as unprofessional, but since they make great strings that are commonly used by top players it is worth me going to some trouble to cut through their misguided secrecy and mysticism and find out what the weights and tensions actually are.

Since I started running Violorama, I have had an extra interest in finding out the weights and tensions of bowed strings. Because Violorama specialises in 5 string instruments, there are extra challenges in sourcing low C strings for violin and high E strings for Viola and Cello.

As well as this I recently bought a Classical guitar. Because I am contrary and difficult, I want to tune it CGDAEB, or if a high B is too much, then at least CGDAEA.

But of course, there are no strings made for classical guitar that will reach a high B, or even an A with any reliability. But Classical guitar trebles are just nylon monofilament. In other words, fishing line. I have been told that it was classical guitarists experimenting with fishing line instead of gut strings that first led to nylon monofilament becoming the standard for classical guitar.

So this opens up a whole world of possibilities. Fishing line is made of all sorts of exciting modern synthetics these days, and some of them are likely to be useful for musical instrument strings. I already use dyneema braid fishing line or sailing rope to attch the tailpieces on violins, violas, and cellos, and I think it has possibilities for strings. Unfortunately Dyneema braid offers zero grip for the bow hair, so unmodified dyeema braid won’t work. I am looking into coatings.

Since I am now investigating monofil strings for classical guitar I’ll also be trying those for bowed strings.

So far I’ve tried a few types of mono line, and I think i’ve found some that work well at high A on classical guitar. But it is frustrating to have to buy a whole roll of line , just to test one meter of it, especially when it proves unsuitable.

I am weighing each type of line, and compiling a database of lines and their characteristics for use as instrument strings.

I am doing the same thing with actual instrument strings, especially those for which no data is published.

You can help by sending my your old strings – and if you have a roll of fishing line, I’d appreciate a meter of that to test too.

I’m going to finish up this post here as a background post, and make a specific request for strings to test in my next post.

The Pink Strat

well , looks like I haven’t blogged for a year.

I have not been idle though, I will try to catch up and post some of the music gear projects I have been doing.

here’s a small and slightly silly one to start with.

I was given this cheap pink strat copy by a friend who bought it on impulse and then thought better of it. The body and neck are not too bad at all, though the look was a bit cheap and the pickups sounded rather meh.

I upgraded it with a black diamond pearl scratch plate and matching knobs, and most importantly some decent pickups.

I think it looks pretty cool. Although the headstock needs repainting , not pictured here, and it would look better if the fretboard were ebony or maybe dyed black which I would normally not consider, but maybe in this case I’ll make an exception.

The new pickups are tonerider pure vintage – amazing value and really sound great with a classic vintage strat tone. (usual disclaimers – I have nothing to do with the companies that make or sell these). They are the real deal vintage design where the polepieces are individual alnico magnets, and the wire and other parts used are also correct for the classic strat twangy tone.

I liked them so much I bought another set for my better strat – details of that one to follow in another post

click on the image for a larger version

New Pillowfish track available for download

Ice Sculptor Isotope 14 version Cover Art

Ice Sculptor Isotope 14 version Cover Art

this new recording uses the valve mic preamps I built over the last couple of months.

It was a learning process for using the new gear and for some recording and mixing techniques we hadn’t used before.

The arrangement features more overdubs than most of our prior work, and is a step towards what we will do on the next full album. The lyrics have also been reworked, see the pillowfish website for details and download!

I built some valve mic preamps

they sound great! I have tried a variety of critical components, different capacitors and transformers.

The lundahl 1538 input transformers sounds great as expected, very open and detailed but the much cheaper OEP A262A3E is not too bad at all either with a pleasing solidity, although a little less detail.

Claritycap capacitors from ICW were the overall winner for coupling capacitors.

More when I get time….

Recording pics

Beginning work on the 2nd Pillowfish album. Recording the zouk with a stereo pair of hypercardiod mics in 60deg XY, and a single 414 as a different sound option.

restoring dynamic range to music

a very well intentioned website at: http://www.dynamicrange.de/

every musician, producer, engineer and listener should know and care about this…

disappointing that their DR measurement plugin is not yet available for osx…

new hosting

moved the blog to my own hosting, running on wordpress, as you can see….

improvements will follow as I have time…